DALE’S CONE OF
EXPERIENCE
Dale
cone of experience is a cone that describes and explains by Edgar Dale about
the levels of what people generally remember and acquiring from their modals of
learning. Dale explains us through the cone that the more we involve our series
of senses (see, hear, do) the more we will remember and learn something. It
means that if we learn only involve one sense in learning such as reading,
seeing, hearing, the percentage of what we are acquiring is more less than if
we combined those senses such as seeing and hearing, saying and writing, or
even doing. That’s way the cone moves from the top toward the bottom, there is
an increase in learning because moving to the bottom we engaged series of
senses.
Dale
believes that learners retain more information of what they do as opposed as
what they heard, read, or observed. These then lead us to the theory that say
“learning by experience”, which we call it as “experiential learning” or
“action learning. According
to Dale, instructors should design instructional activities that build upon
more real-life experiences.
Dales’ cone of experience is a tool to help
instructors make decisions about resources and activities. The instructor can
ask the following:
- Where will the student’s experience with this instructional resource fit on the cone? How far is it removed from real-life
- What kind of learning experience do you want to provide in the classroom?
- How does this instructional resource augment the information supplied by the textbook?
- What and how many senses can students use to learn this instructional material?
- Does the instructional material enhance learning?
The
utility of the cone in teaching learning process is that even the teacher and
the students can create an effective activity in the classroom to achieve the
maximum outcome of learning. As what have been explained before, that the more
we engaged or combined the series of senses, the more we will achieve the
outcome of learning.
However, it depends to the learners in using these modals of learning. If the learners are young learners, it would be better if we use the activities from the bottom of the cone, where learning is directly done by the learners which involve their series of senses, because its hard for them to learn in singular sense. However, if the learners are old or advance learners, the use of the modals from the top is good too, because they have been able to learn in that way.
However, it depends to the learners in using these modals of learning. If the learners are young learners, it would be better if we use the activities from the bottom of the cone, where learning is directly done by the learners which involve their series of senses, because its hard for them to learn in singular sense. However, if the learners are old or advance learners, the use of the modals from the top is good too, because they have been able to learn in that way.
References:
·
Anderson, H. Milia, P.Hd. Dale’s Cone of
Experience. Assistant Dean for
Education Innovation, University of Kentucky. University of Kentucky.
No comments:
Post a Comment